Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A reaction of heteroscorpionated ligands HL1 and HL2 (L1 = (3,5-Me2Pz)2CHP(Ph)2NPh, L2 = (3,5-Me2Pz)2CHP(Ph)2NPh(2-OMe), Pz = pyrazole) with homoleptic calcium amide Ca[N(SiMe3)2]2(THF)2, respectively, afforded novel zwitterionic calcium complexes L1CaN(SiMe3)2(THF) (1) and L2CaN(SiMe3)2 (2) through protolysis. 1 and 2 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy. The chemical shifts of the protons of pyrazole and phosphino phenyl within 1 are similar to those in complex 2, while the chemical shift of phosphine in complex 2 (28.66 ppm) is a little higher than that in complex 1 (11.43 ppm). The structures of complexes 1 and 2 were determined by X-ray diffraction analysis. Both 1 and 2 adopt a distorted trigonal bipyramidal geometry. L1 and L2 chelate to the calcium ion through a κ3 and κ4 fashion, respectively. 1 and 2 were assayed towards the ROP of rac-lactide. Both of them catalyzed the polymerization in a controlled manner. With the increase of the feeding ratio of the monomer to catalyst, the molecular weights increased linearly. At 25 °C, these two calcium complexes catalyzed the ROP of rac-lactide to afford atactic polylactides. Surprisingly, at −75 °C, complex 1 gave a heterotactic sequence enriched polylactide (Pr = 0.84); in contrast, complex 2 produced an isotactic sequence enriched polymer. The reason behind was elucidated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: