Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reverse engineering (RE) of electronic systems is performed for many different reasons, including, but not limited to, failure analysis and fault isolation, obsolescence management, proof of IP rights infringement, security assessment, development of attacks, and counterfeiting. Regardless of the goal, it is imperative that the community understands the requirements, complexities, and limitations of RE. Traditional RE is based on a destructive process of serial sectioning followed by imaging, which is time-consuming, expensive, and error-prone. However, with the advent of advanced characterization tools and imaging software, this is starting to change. In this paper, we introduce a nondestructive approach for printed circuit board (PCB) RE based on X-ray tomography. The imaging parameters for a successful tomography are explained in detail and combined with advanced 3-D image processing and analysis to automate RE, thereby lowering the associated time and cost. We demonstrate our proposed process on two PCBs, a four-layer custom designed board, and a more complex commercial board. Lessons learned from this effort can be used to both develop advanced countermeasures and establish a more efficient workflow for instances where RE is unavoidable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Asadizanjani et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: