Why the study?
Does video assisted rigid thoracoscopy improve diagnostic yield in patients with unexplained exudative pleural effusion?
Does video assisted rigid thoracoscopy improve diagnostic yield in patients with unexplained exudative pleural effusion?
Video assisted rigid thoracoscopy provides a high diagnostic yield (92.3%) with minimal risk for patients with unexplained exudative pleural effusions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports thoracoscopy as safe diagnostic option in unexplained exudative effusions; leaves open randomized trials for confirmation.
INTRODUCTION: An undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion is often a difficult diagnostic dilemma that needs further histological study for a definitive etiological diagnosis. Video assisted rigid thoracoscopy is a minimally invasive procedure with a minor morbidity and mortality risk that could resolve this problem. METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2011, we performed thoracoscopy in 26 patients for diagnosis of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion. Clinical and paraclinical data of patients were collected prospectively and analyzed. RESULTS: Sole pleural effusion was the most common CT scan finding seen in 17 (65.4%) patients. Thoracoscopy was diagnostic in 24 patients (92.3%). The pathologic findings were carcinoma (46.2%), tuberculosis (30.8%) and chronic inflammation without a definitive microbiologic culture (15.4%). Surprisingly mean ADA level in the tuberculosis group was in normal range. No mortality or complication related to our operation was observed. CONCLUSION: Video assisted thoracoscopy is a minimally invasive procedure with a high definitive diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of tuberculosis and malignant pleural effusions. Pulmonologist should refer these patients sooner to decrease the waiting period of diagnosis and treatment of such conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beheshtirouy et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: