Why the study?
Postoperative atrial fibrillation frequently occurs after CABG and increases stroke and mortality risk, but OAC use remains inconsistent and the care gap is unknown.
What is the rate of oral anticoagulation prescription and what factors are associated with its use in patients developing postoperative atrial fibrillation after isolated CABG?
What is the rate of oral anticoagulation prescription and what factors are associated with its use in patients developing postoperative atrial fibrillation after isolated CABG?
There is a significant care gap in stroke prevention for patients developing postoperative atrial fibrillation after CABG, with only 1 in 5 receiving indicated oral anticoagulation at discharge, heavily influenced by concurrent DAPT use and surgeon preference.
Low OAC prescription rates after CABG POAF signal a potential care gap; this observational finding leaves open optimal strategies for stroke prevention.
BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) commonly occurs after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Patients with POAF are at higher risk of stroke and mortality. The use of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in POAF remains inconsistent, and the care gap is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate rate of adherence and factors associated with OAC use in POAF patients after isolated CABG. METHODS: In this study, all patients who had an isolated CABG between April 1, 2019 and March 30, 2020, at Health Sciences North, Sudbury retrospectively were evaluated. We identified all patients who developed POAF and captured the use of OAC. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of OAC prescription. RESULTS: In total, 339 CABG patients between April 1, 2019 and March 30, 2020, were identified; 86 patients developed POAF. No patients had major perioperative bleeding. All POAF patients had an indication for OAC therapies based on CHADS 65 score. However, only 17 (19.8%) patients with POAF had OAC prescription at the time of hospital discharge. Baseline characteristics were similar between those with or without OAC. In multivariable analysis, the use of dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a decreased use of OAC therapy in POAF (OR 0.037 (95% CI 0.005, 0.29), P = .002). Moreover, in comparison to surgeon A, surgeon B was associated with a decreased use of OAC therapy, whereas surgeon C was associated with an increased use of OAC therapy in POAF (OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.03, 0.83), P = .03 and OR 6.49 (95% CI 1.21, 34.82), P = .03, respectively). None of the CHADS 65 elements, including age, hypertension, stroke, diabetes mellitus or congestive heart failure, correlated with the use of OAC. KEY FINDINGS: Eighty percent of patients who developed POAF after isolated CABG failed to receive stroke prevention therapies. The use of dual antiplatelet therapy and individual surgeons' preference were associated with the use of OAC therapy among POAF. CONCLUSIONS: This data set suggests that approximately only 1 in 5 patients with POAF after isolated CABG got prescribed OAC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shurrab et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: