Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The kinetics and mechanism(s) of the reactions of [K(Krypt)][LCuO 2 ] (Krypt = 4,7,13,16,21,24-hexaoxa-1,10-diazabicyclo[8.8.8]hexacosane, L = a bis(arylcarboxamido)pyridine ligand) with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperdine- N -hydroxide (TEMPOH) and the para-substituted phenols X ArOH (X = para substituent NO 2, CF 3, Cl, H, Me, t Bu, OMe, or NMe 2 ) at low temperatures were studied. The reaction with TEMPOH occurs rapidly ( k = 35.4 ± 0.3 M –1 s –1 ) by second-order kinetics to yield TEMPO • and [LCuOOH] − on the basis of electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, the production of H 2 O 2 upon treatment with protic acid, and independent preparation from reaction of [NBu 4 ][LCuOH] with H 2 O 2 ( K eq = 0.022 ± 0.007 for the reverse reaction). The reactions with X ArOH also follow second-order kinetics, and analysis of the variation of the k values as a function of phenol properties (Hammett σ parameter, O–H bond dissociation free energy, p K a, E 1/2 ) revealed a change in mechanism across the series, from proton transfer/electron transfer for X = NO 2, CF 3, Cl to concerted-proton/electron transfer (or hydrogen-atom transfer) for X = OMe, NMe 2 (data for X = H, Me, t Bu are intermediate between the extremes). Thermodynamic analysis and comparisons to previous results for LCuOH, a different copper–oxygen intermediate with the same supporting ligand, and literature for other [CuO 2 ] + complexes reveal significant differences in proton-coupled electron-transfer mechanisms that have implications for understanding oxidation catalysis by copper-containing enzymes and abiological catalysts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bailey et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: