Ionization (IP) and appearance potentials (AP) have been secured for apparently competing [M NO2] cleavage and [M NO] rearrangement reactions in a series of m-and p-X substituted nitrobenzene molecular ions. Approximate activation energies AP–IP were within the experimental reproducibility for most substituents for the [M NO2] reaction of m-and p-X isomer pairs of compounds, but outside it for the [M NO] process. This is interpreted as either effective substituent randomization in the reacting molecular ions or as fortuitously similar activation energies for the [M NO2] cleavage. Assuming the latter, AP–IP for both reactions gave acceptably linear correlations of negative slope when plotted against σ or σ+, which has been interpreted mechanistically in terms of a degree of positive charge dissipation in the rate limiting transition states. These findings are in direct contrast to the energetics of the [M CH3] and [M CH2O] reactions recently studied in substituted anisoles, where plots of AP–IP vs. σ+ displayed positive slopes. The advantages of AP–IP over peak relative abundance as a mechanistic probe are discussed, and corresponding plots of logZ/Z0 vs. σ(σ+) and log [A0]/[M0] (1 – f) vs. σ(σ+) for the same reactions are presented and discussed. The disadvantages and limitations of IP and AP measurements are also emphasized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter Brown (1970) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: