Apolipoprotein E deletion potentiates relaxations to IP receptor activation and prevents the blunting effect of a high-fat diet in mouse aortae.
May inform ApoE-targeted vascular protection in metabolic stress; leaves open translation from mouse aortae to humans.
Background and Purpose NO‐mediated, endothelium‐dependent relaxations of isolated arteries are blunted by ageing and high‐fat diets, as well as by apolipoprotein E deletion. The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that apolipoprotein E deletion impairs endothelium‐dependent responses to prostacyclin (IP) receptor activation. Experimental Approach Five‐week‐old ApoE +/+ and ApoE −/− mice were fed normal chow or high‐fat diet for 29 weeks. The aortae were isolated for the measurements of isometric tension in Halpern–Mulvany myographs. Levels of proteins were assessed by Western blotting and immunofluorescence, and cyclic nucleotide levels by elisa . Key Results The IP receptor agonist, iloprost, induced endothelium‐, NO‐synthase‐ and IP‐dependent relaxations in aortae of young ApoE +/+ mice. High‐fat diet favoured activation of thromboxane receptors by iloprost, causing contraction. Apolipoprotein E was present in aortae of ApoE +/+ mice, especially in endothelium. Its presence was augmented by high‐fat diet. Its deletion potentiated iloprost‐induced relaxations in aortae of young mice and prevented the blunting of this response by high‐fat diet. Levels of cAMP were higher, but those of cGMP were lower in the aorta of ApoE −/− than in ApoE +/+ mice of the same age. The levels of IP receptor protein were not different between ApoE +/+ and ApoE −/− mice. Conclusions and Implications Iloprost induced an endothelium‐dependent relaxation in the aorta of young healthy mice which involved both the cGMP and cAMP pathways. This response was blunted by prolonged exposure to a high‐fat diet. Apolipoprotein E deletion potentiated relaxations to IP receptor activation, independently of age and diet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: