Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The electrochemical properties of cytochrome c (cyt c) adsorbed on mixed self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate (MES)/2-mercaptoethanol (MEL) are compared with those on single-component SAMs of MES, MEL, and mercaptopropionic acid (MPA), using cyclic voltammetry and potential-modulated UV-vis reflectance spectroscopy. The rate constant of electron transfer (ET), k(et), of cyt c adsorbed on the SAM of MPA decreases from 1450 +/- 210 s(-1) at pH 7 to 890 +/- 100 s(-1) at pH 9. In contrast, the value of k(et) of cyt c on the SAM of MES is pH-independent at 100 +/- 15 s(-1). Those facts suggest that a large negative charge density on the SAM surface slows down the ET between cyt c and the electrode. The surface charge density of the SAM affects also the amount of electroactive cyt c, Gamma(e), which decreases from 10.0 +/- 1.0 to 5.3 +/- 1.1 pmol cm(-2) with increasing pH from 7 to 9 on the SAM of MPA. Similarly, the k(et) of cyt c adsorbed on the mixed SAMs of MES/MEL sharply decreases from 900 +/- 300 s(-1) to 110 s(-1) as the surface mole fraction of MES increases beyond 0.5, suggesting the presence of a negative surface charge threshold beyond which the rate of ET of cyt c is dramatically lowered. The decrease in the k(et) on the SAMs at high negative charge densities probably results from the confinement of adsorbed cyt c by the strong electrostatic force to an orientation that is not optimal for the ET reaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imabayashi et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: