We synthesized three conjugated polymers involving sulfur (S)-inserted and chlorine (Cl)-substituted side chains of the parent two-dimensional conjugated polymer—poly(benzodithiophene–thiophene–benzooxadiazole) (BO)—to form S-inserted (BO2S), Cl-substituted (BO2Cl), and S-inserted with Cl-substituted (BO2S2Cl) polymers for tuning their surface energies and, thus, interaction with IT-4F small molecule in their binary blends. In the BO:IT-4F blend, the bulk heterojunction (BHJ) structure was constituted mainly from the long-rod BO domains along with a few IT-4F domains that dispersed well in the blend; in contrast, favorable networks for charge transport existed in the BO2S or BO2S2Cl with IT-4F blend. The disk sizes of IT-4F in the BO2S2Cl:IT-4F blend were larger than that in the BO2S:IT-4F blend (23.3 vs 18.1 nm). As the extent of atom variation increased from BO to BO2S to BO2S2Cl, the induced IT-4F crystallinity increased, and the orientation of molecular packing of the polymer varied. The highest PCE (12.06%) was that for the device based on the double sulfur-inserted/chlorine-substituted side chain polymer and IT-4F acceptor (BO2S2Cl:IT-4F), owing to the more balanced hole-to-electron mobility, being consistent with the value predicted (11.8%) using the random forest machine learning model. This study not only provides insight into the photovoltaic performance of the polymers with atom-inserted or -substituted side chain but also reveals that the effects of molecular packing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: