Theoretical analysis reveals violations of Savage's sure-thing principle in sequential operations, highlighting key boundaries of conditional probability.
This paradox is the possibility of P(A|B) <P(A|B') even though P(A|B)≥P(A| B') both under the additional condition C and under the complement C' of that condition. Details are given on why this can happen and how extreme the inequalities can be. An example shows that Savage's sure-thing principle (“If you would definitely prefer g to f, either knowing that the event C obtained, or knowing that C did not obtain, then you definitely prefer g to f.”) is not applicable to alternatives f and g that involve sequential operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colin R. Blyth (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: