Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
), C∧N-chelated phenylpyridine(phpy), and pyridine (py) ligands has more potent antitumor activity as a new generation of drug than cisplatin toward various cancer cells. However, poor site-specific delivery, low solubility, and poor tumor penetration are common limitations of chemotherapy drugs. To develop CD44-targetable, pH-, and reduction-responsive drug delivery systems for Ir(III) drugs, the amphiphilic hyaluronan (HA)-based conjugates of HA-cystamin-pyrenyl (HA-ss-Py) containing disulfide bonds and HA-pyrenyl (HA-Py) were designed. The Ir(III) drug was readily loaded into these two amphiphilic conjugates and nanoparticles were formed. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) studies showed that the micelles formed from HA-ss-Py were sufficiently stable under physiological conditions, but were prone to rapid dissociation in reducing environments (20 mM glutathione (GSH)). In subsequent confocal microscopy analyses, A549 cancer cells efficiently internalized HA-based micelles. Moreover, in vitro cytotoxicity assays in A549 cells demonstrat that Ir-loaded HA-based nanoparticles have higher cytotoxicity than the free Ir(III) anticancer drug. Finally, systemic administration of Ir(III)-loaded HA-ss-Py nanoparticles enhanced tumor inhibition in vivo, and the corresponding biodistribution experiments showed that HA-ss-Py micelles accumulate in tumors. Overall, our results suggest that HA-ss-Py micelles have a great potential to be used as an effective Ir(III) drug carrier for targeted cancer therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: