Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Against the backdrop of comments on chemistry research in India made in three recent reports by Nature Index, Elsevier and Thomson Reuters, we have made a scientometric analysis contributions from India in leading multidisciplinary chemistry journals over the 25-year period 1991–2015. We have compared India’s performance with that of China as a benchmark. Overall, number of chemistry papers from India increased steadily between 2007 and 2014. The threeyear moving average of number of papers during the period grew at a compound annual growth of 8.9%, and the overall increase in papers was accompanied by a more than proportionate in the leading journals. Also, the average number of cites received by papers with at least author from India in Angewandte Chemie International Edition (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.) and of Chemical Research was higher than the world average. Despite its huge share of the ’s population (~17%), India continues to be poorly represented in the top journals: the country’s share of papers in the Journal of the American Chemical Society is 0.7% compared to 58.4% USA, 7.6% for Germany and 5.1% for China, and its share in Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. is 1.2% to 28% for Germany, 25.3% for USA and 9.9% for China. This could be due to the fact till recently Indian universities did not encourage mobility across disciplines. That only a small of Indian researchers and institutions publish in leading journals is also a matter for concern. India accounts for only a small number of papers in the top one percentile of the most highly chemistry papers, whereas China leads the world. Only 2.3% of the 2234 papers published in 2014 that are in the top one percentile is from India compared to 38% from China
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arunachalam et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: