This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Purpose To evaluate the long-term efficacy of and tolerance to adalimumab in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (JIA-U).Methods This retrospective study included patients with JIA-U who completed the ADJUVITE trial with at least 2 years and up to 5 years of follow-up after the end of the trial (i.e. at least 3 years and up to 6 years of follow-up after randomization). Data, including treatment course, visual and anatomical outcomes, uveitis activity evaluated by laser flare photometry, and safety were collected from medical records.Results Forty-one eyes of 25 participants with a mean age of 10.5 ± 4.0 years at the end of the trial were enrolled. Twenty-one patients (84%) responded to adalimumab during a mean follow-up period of 68.0 ± 21.6 months (range 26–109 months, post-trial), and among the responders, one patient could discontinue adalimumab without further uveitis relapse. Five years after the end of the trial, the mean BCVA improved to 0.07 ± 0.39 logMAR (vs. 0.14 ± 0.20 logMAR, p = 0.048) and the mean anterior chamber flare decreased to 29.9 ± 19.1 ph/ms (vs. 37.2 ± 35.0 ph/ms, p = 0.170). The mean dose of methotrexate decreased significantly from 11.3 ± 4.4 mg/week at the end of the trial to 5.2 ± 6.2 mg/week at the last follow-up (p = 0.002). Four patients did not respond to adalimumab and required other biologics. Adalimumab was well-tolerated in all patients.Conclusions Adalimumab was effective in maintaining long-term uveitis control in patients with JIA-U, with a good safety profile. However, complete discontinuation was not possible in most cases, confirming the suspending effect of adalimumab.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: