The electrochemical deposition of ethanethiolate monolayers on Ag(111) has been investigated by in-situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM), and voltammetric methods. In aqueous 0.2 M NaOH solutions containing 5 mM ethanethiolate, the voltammetric response at Ag(111) displays two well-resolved surface waves with half-wave potentials ( E 1/2 ) of −1.17 and −0.95 V vs Ag/AgCl. The two-wave voltammetric response suggests a mechanism of monolayer deposition that consists of two energetically-distinct reaction steps, a conclusion supported by in-situ SERS and EQCM measurements of the potential-dependent adsorption isotherm. The voltammetric wave located at more negative potentials ( E 1/2 = −1.17 V) has a nearly ideal Nernstian shape and is associated with the initial rapid oxidative adsorption of ethanethiolate at submonolayer coverage. The second wave at more positive potentials ( E 1/2 = −0.95 V) corresponds to additional, but kinetically slower, oxidative adsorption of ethanethiolate resulting in an essentially complete monolayer (∼7.8 × 10 - 10 mol/cm 2 ). The slower kinetics associated with this wave, as well as general features of the wave shape, suggest that structural ordering of the monolayer occurs during the second oxidation. A thermodynamic expression for the dependence of E 1/2 on the bulk solution concentration of ethanethiolate is derived and employed to determine the number of electrons transferred, n = 1.06 ± 0.06, per molecule of ethanethiolate adsorbed on the Ag(111) surface. A value of n = 0.90 ± 0.14 has also been independently determined by EQCM and coulometric measurements of the mass adsorbed and electrical charge consumed, respectively, during monolayer deposition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hatchett et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: