Anionic polymerizations of 1‐adamantyl methacrylate ( 1 ) and 3‐methacryloyloxy‐1,1′‐biadamantane ( 2 ) were carried out in THF at −50 to −78 °C for 24 h. The initiator employed was either [1,1‐bis(4′‐trimethylsilylphenyl)‐3‐methylpentyl]lithium ( 3 )/lithium chloride, or diphenylmethylpotassium. The polymerizations of 1 and 2 proceeded quantitatively to afford the polymers having the predicted molecular weights based on the molar ratios of monomers and initiators and the narrow molecular weight distributions ( M w / M n = 1.05–1.18), indicating the living character of the polymerization systems of 1 and 2 . Novel well‐defined block copolymers, poly[ 2 ‐ block ‐( tert ‐butyl methacrylate)], poly( 2 ‐ block ‐isoprene‐ block ‐ 2 ), and poly[[(2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐dioxolan‐4‐yl)methyl methacrylate]‐ block ‐ 2 ], were anionically synthesized by the sequential copolymerization of 2 and comonomers. The poly( 2 ) had the significantly higher glass transition temperature ( T g ) of 236 °C and decomposed over 370 °C, while poly( 1 ) started to decompose at around 320 °C before its T g was reached. This thermal stability can be explained by the substituent effects of the bulky adamantyl and 1,1′‐biadamantyl moieties. magnified image
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ishizone et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: