Why the study?
SARS-CoV-2 testing faced challenges due to an initial shortage of supplies, expertise, and instrumentation needed for RT-qPCR detection.
Can academic laboratories successfully produce in-house SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test kits that compare favorably with commercial products?
Can academic laboratories successfully produce in-house SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test kits that compare favorably with commercial products?
Academic laboratories can successfully produce SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test kits in-house to backfill supply chain shortages.
Widespread testing for the presence of the novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals remains vital for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic prior to the advent of an effective treatment. Challenges in testing can be traced to an initial shortage of supplies, expertise, and/or instrumentation necessary to detect the virus by quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR), the most robust, sensitive, and specific assay currently available. Here we show that academic biochemistry and molecular biology laboratories equipped with appropriate expertise and infrastructure can replicate commercially available SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test kits and backfill pipeline shortages. The Georgia Tech COVID-19 Test Kit Support Group, composed of faculty, staff, and trainees across the biotechnology quad at Georgia Institute of Technology, synthesized multiplexed primers and probes and formulated a master mix composed of enzymes and proteins produced in-house. Our in-house kit compares favorably with a commercial product used for diagnostic testing. We also developed an environmental testing protocol to readily monitor surfaces for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. Our blueprint should be readily reproducible by research teams at other institutions, and our protocols may be modified and adapted to enable SARS-CoV-2 detection in more resource-limited settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mascuch et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: