Why the study?
While investigating outcomes of balloon dilatation for congenital obstructive heart lesions, several parallel observations were made, prompting a review to present these observations, phenomena, and innovations.
This review summarizes the author's clinical observations and technical innovations regarding balloon dilatation for congenital obstructive heart lesions.
Should not change practice for congenital lesions; leaves open need for prospective validation of balloon techniques.
While investigating the outcomes of balloon dilatation procedures in patients with congenital obstructive lesions of the heart, several parallel observations were made. The purpose of this review is to present these observations/phenomena/innovations related to balloon dilatation of pulmonary stenosis (PS), aortic stenosis (AS), and aortic coarctation (AC). In subjects who had balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty (BPV), development of infundibular obstruction, electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, changes in right ventricular filling, role of balloon/annulus ratios on the results of BPV, and double balloon vs. single balloon BPV will be reviewed. In patients who had balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV), causes of aortic insufficiency and trans-umbilical venous approach for BAV are tackled. In children who had balloon angioplasty (BA) of AC, aortic remodeling and biophysical response after BA of AC are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P. Syamasundar Rao (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: