Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biosynthesis of sucrose-6-P catalyzed by sucrose-phosphate synthase (SPS), and the presence of sucrose-phosphate phosphatase (SPP) leading to the formation of sucrose, have both been ascertained in a prokaryotic organism: Anabaena 7119, a filamentous heterocystic cyanobacterium. Two SPS activities (SPS-I and SPS-II) were isolated by ion-exchange chromatography and partially purified. Four remarkable differences between SPSs from Anabaena and those from higher plants were shown: substrate specificity, effect of divalent cations, native molecular mass, and oligomeric composition. Both SPS-I and SPS-II accept Fru-6-P (K(m) for SPS-I = 0.8 +/- 0.1 mM; K(m) for SPS-II = 0.7 +/- 0.1 mM) and UDP-Glc as substrates (K(m) for SPS-I = 1.3 +/- 0.4 mM; K(m) for SPS-II = 4.6 +/- 0.4 mM), but unlike higher plant enzymes, they are not specific for UDP-Glc. GDP-Glc and TDP-Glc are also SPS-I substrates (K(m) for GDP-Glc = 1.2 +/- 0.2 mM and K(m) for TDP-Glc = 4.0 +/- 0.4 mM), and ADP-Glc is used by SPS-II (K(m) for ADP-Glc = 5.7 +/- 0.7 mM). SPS-I has an absolute dependence toward divalent metal ions (Mg2+ or Mn2+) for catalytic activity, not found in plants. A strikingly smaller native molecular mass (between 45 and 47 kDa) was determined by gel filtration for both SPSs, which, when submitted to SDS/PAGE, showed a monomeric composition. Cyanobacteria are, as far as the authors know, the most primitive organisms that are able to biosynthesize sucrose as higher plants do.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porchia et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: