This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The presence of a positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has been considered a highly questionable indication for orthotopic liver transplantation. We report our experience in the treatment of HBsAg-positive HBV-DNA-negative cirrhotics with liver transplantation, whether or not followed by passive prophylaxis with specific immunoglobulins. Of the 123 cirrhotics who received transplants at our institution since May 1986, 39 (31.7%) were HBsAg positive; of these, 1 was HBV-DNA positive, and 4 were hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) positive. Since April 1991, 25 HBsAg-positive HBV-DNA-negative cirrhotics have undergone an original protocol with the periodical intramuscular administration of 5,000 IU of specific immunoglobulins starting in the anhepatic phase and lasting for at least 1 year. There were no differences among cirrhotics in terms of operative mortality and long-term survival with respect to the presence of the HBsAg. Of the 35 HBsAg-positive HBV-DNA-negative patients having a follow-up of 1 month or longer, 12 (34.3%) developed HBsAg recurrence; of them, 4 (33.3%) had received a complete prophylaxis, whereas 8 (66.7%) had not. The recurrence rate was 80% (8 out of 10) in the group of patients who had not received the prophylaxis and 16% (4 out of 25) in the group who had received the prophylaxis (P = .0003). The actuarial recurrence rate in the treated patients was 20.2% and 20.2% after 1 and 3 years, respectively, whereas in the untreated group it was 60.0% and 70.0% (P < .01). The hazard of recurrence of treated patients was reduced to 24.9% compared with untreated patients. Liver transplantation can be performed in HBsAg-positive HBV DNA negative patients without an increase in the operative risk or a worsening of long-term results. Immunoglobulin prophylaxis seems to be effective in preventing hepatitis recurrence after transplantation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grazi et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: