Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohen’s κ (kappa) is typically used as a measure of degree of rater agreement. It is often criticized because it is marginal-dependent. In this article, this characteristic is explained and illustrated in the context of (1) nonuniform marginal probability distributions, (2) odds ratios that remain constant while κ changes in the presence of varying marginal distributions, and (3) percentages of raw agreement that remain constant while κ changes in the presence of varying marginal distributions. The meaning and interpretation of κ are explained with reference to the log-linear main effect model of variable independence. This model is used for the estimation of the expected cell frequencies of agreement tables. It is shown that the interpretation of κ as a measure of degree of agreement is incorrect. The correct interpretation is that κ assesses the degree of agreement beyond that expected based on a statistical model such as the independence or the null model. Based on Goodman’s (1991) distinction between marginal-free and marginal-dependent measures, it is shown that κ is marginal-dependent. It shares this characteristic with the well-known χ 2 -statistic and the correlation coefficient for cross-classifications. In contrast, the odds ratio, the unweighted log-linear interaction, and the percentage of raw agreement are marginal-free. Therefore, the expectation that marginal-dependent κ would reflect the same data characteristics as some of the marginal-free measures is misguided. It is recommended that researchers report both measures of degree of agreement and measures of agreement beyond some expectation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eye et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: