Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Variable-temperature spectroscopic and crystallographic studies on the chromium(II) Tutton's salts, (MI)2Cr(X2O)6(SO4)2, where MI = ND4+, Rb+, or Cs+, and X = H or D, are reported. Inelastic neutron scattering (INS) and multifrequency EPR experiments facilitate a rigorous definition of the ground-state electronic structure from 1.5 up to 296 K, which is unprecedented for a high-spin d4 complex. Modeling of the INS data using a conventional S = 2 spin Hamiltonian reveals a dramatic variation in the axial and rhombic zero-field-splitting parameters. For the ammonium salt, D and E are -2.454(3) and 0.087(3) cm(-1) at 10 K and -2.29(2) and 0.16(3) cm(-1) at 250 K, respectively. A temperature variation in the stereochemistry of the [Cr(D2O)6]2+ complex is also identified, with an apparent coalescence of the long and medium Cr-O bond lengths at temperatures above 150 K. The corresponding changes for the rubidium and cesium salts are notable, though less pronounced. The experimental quantities are interpreted using a 5Ee Jahn-Teller Hamiltonian, perturbed by anisotropic strain. It is shown that good agreement can be obtained only by employing a model in which the anisotropic strain is itself temperature dependent. A new theoretical approach for calculating variable-temperature EPR spectra of high-spin d4 complexes, developed within the 5Ee coupling model, is described. Differences between spin-Hamiltonian parameters determined by INS and EPR are consistent with those of the different time scales of the two techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dobe et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: