Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The limits of accuracy for the quantitation of anti-D using the AutoAnalyzer have been reduced from +/- 26% with manually prepared dilutions to +/- 14% using an automatic pipette, as expressed by the 95% confidence limits. The error inherent in the AutoAnalyzer was estimated to contribute +/- 10% to the overall error. Problems associated with the reproducibility of this method for anti-D quantitation have been investigated, namely, the effect of the age of a given test cell, the use of different test cells, loss of sensitivity of the machine over a given day, and the reproducibility of results obtained at different positions on the standard graph.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunson et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: