The interaction of trimeric perfluoro-o-phenylene mercury (1) with TEMPO (1,1,5,5-tetramethylpentamethylene nitroxide) in CH2Cl2 leads to the formation of the 1:1 adduct [1.TEMPO] (2). The same reaction carried out with NIT-Ph (2-(phenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide) leads to the formation of either [1.NIT-Ph.1] (3) or [1*NIT-Ph]n (4), depending on the amount of NIT-Ph present in solution. Adducts 2, 3, and 4 have been fully characterized and their crystal structures determined. The solid-state structure of 2 contains molecules of [1*TEMPO] in which the nitroxide oxygen atom is triply coordinated to the mercury centers of 1. A similar situation is encountered in the structure of 3 where each oxygen atom of the NIT-Ph molecule interacts with the mercury centers of an adjacent molecule of 1. The structure of 4 consists of extended helical polymeric chains that contain alternating molecules of 1 and NIT-Ph. As in 2 and 3, the interactions responsible for the formation of these chains involve the triple coordination of the oxygen atoms of the NIT-Ph molecule to the mercury centers of 1. DFT calculations suggest that the bonding in adducts such as 2, 3, and 4 is most likely dominated by electrostatic rather than covalent interactions. In agreement with this view, magnetic susceptibility measurements carried out on these adducts indicate that 1 does not mediate significant coupling between organic radicals coordinated on either side of the trinuclear core.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haneline et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: