Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Controlling collective electronic states through clean and reversible external stimuli is crucial for realizing functional quantum materials. Here, we report a study on temperature ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>T</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:math> ) and pressure ( <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mrow> <b:mi>P</b:mi> </b:mrow> </b:math> )-tuned charge-density-wave (CDW) orders in the quasi-one-dimensional system of <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mrow> <c:mi>NbS</c:mi> <c:msub> <c:mi mathvariant="normal">e</c:mi> <c:mn>3</c:mn> </c:msub> </c:mrow> </c:math> , through single-crystal x-ray diffraction, and electric and magnetotransport measurements. A refined and extended phase diagram is presented, prompting a reevaluation of earlier claims regarding the coexistence of CDW and superconductivity (SC). Here, SC is found to emerge only once all long-range CDWs are suppressed. Notably, the anomalous Hall and magnetoresistance (MR) effects observed at low pressure ( <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <e:mrow> <e:mi>LP</e:mi> <e:mo>∼</e:mo> <e:mn>0.8</e:mn> <e:mspace width="0.16em"/> <e:mi>GPa</e:mi> </e:mrow> </e:math> ) may arise from distinct carrier types associated with the two competing CDWs, CDW1 and CDW2. These two coexisting CDWs, characterized by distinct modulation vectors, <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <g:msub> <g:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">q</g:mi> <g:mn mathvariant="bold">1</g:mn> </g:msub> </g:math> and <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <j:msub> <j:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">q</j:mi> <j:mn mathvariant="bold">2</j:mn> </j:msub> </j:math> , show pressure-induced opposing shifts in their <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>b</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo>*</m:mo> </m:msup> </m:math> axis projections (denoted as <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <n:msubsup> <n:mi>q</n:mi> <n:mn>1</n:mn> <n:mrow> <n:mi>b</n:mi> <n:mo>*</n:mo> </n:mrow> </n:msubsup> </n:math> and <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <o:msubsup> <o:mi>q</o:mi> <o:mn>2</o:mn> <o:mrow> <o:mi>b</o:mi> <o:mo>*</o:mo> </o:mrow> </o:msubsup> </o:math> ), while preserving a phase-coupling relationship 2( <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <p:mrow> <p:msub> <p:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">q</p:mi> <p:mn mathvariant="bold">1</p:mn> </p:msub> <p:mo>+</p:mo> <p:msub> <p:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">q</p:mi> <p:mn mathvariant="bold">2</p:mn> </p:msub> </p:mrow> </p:math> ) <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <u:mrow> <u:mo>∼</u:mo> <u:mo>[</u:mo> <u:mn>111</u:mn> <u:mo>]</u:mo> </u:mrow> </u:math> . Upon gradual suppression of the long range order CDW2 order, <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <v:msubsup> <v:mi>q</v:mi> <v:mn>1</v:mn> <v:mrow> <v:mi>b</v:mi> <v:mo>*</v:mo> </v:mrow> </v:msubsup> </v:math> of CDW1 stabilizes and enters a decoupled regime within <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <w:mrow> <w:mo>∼</w:mo> <w:mn>0.8</w:mn> <w:mo>−</w:mo> <w:mn>1.3</w:mn> </w:mrow> </w:math> GPa, followed by a pronounced change in its periodicity between <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <x:mrow> <x:mo>∼</x:mo> <x:mn>1.3</x:mn> </x:mrow> </x:math> and 2.9 GPa. Above 2.9 GPa, all long-range CDW orders vanish, giving way to emergent superconductivity (SC).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: