Atactic polystyrene (aPS)/poly(2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (PPO) and isotactic polystyrene (iPS)/PPO compatible blends of varied composition were subjected to solid‐state coextrusion. The efficiency of drawing, orientation, and crystallinity development were studied as a function of composition and draw ratio. The efficiency of drawing, as measured by elastic recovery, is high for coextrusion at temperatures ≲40°C above the glass transition temperature of the particular blend. The maximum attainable draw ratio for the blends decreased with increasing PPO concentration; the highest blend draw ratio attained was 6.5 for 25 wt % PPO. The orientation on drawing, as measured by birefringence, increased with draw but decreased with increasing PPO component at the same draw ratio. When PPO was <50% in iPS/PPO blends, iPS crystallized on draw. The morphology of drawn blends was studied by electron microscopy and wide‐angle x‐ray scattering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: