Why the study?
Does sirolimus-eluting stent implantation prevent recurrence in patients with intractable in-stent restenosis?
Does sirolimus-eluting stent implantation prevent recurrence in patients with intractable in-stent restenosis?
Sirolimus-eluting stents may be an effective treatment option for intractable in-stent restenosis following bare-metal stent implantation.
Supports potential role of sirolimus-eluting stents in intractable restenosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
A 51-year-old man was admitted due to an acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. After thrombolytic therapy using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator, stent implantation was performed from the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) to the mid LAD using a bare-metal stent (BMS). Since then, the patient suffered five repeated episodes of in-stent restenosis (ISR). At the first ISR, he was treated with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). At the second ISR, he was treated with brachytherapy, and at the third ISR, he was treated with POBA and one more BMS distal to the previously implanted stent. At the forth, only POBA was performed, and finally, at the fifth ISR, a sirolimus-eluting stent was implanted. Following that, the patient remained asymptomatic and follow-up coronary angiography showed no ISR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hachinohe et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: