Mobility and bioavailability of nickel (Ni) in soil strongly depends on the interaction between Ni(II), ligands, and sorbents like organic matter and minerals. Sorption of Ni(II) and Ni(II)-citrate complexes to goethite and montmorillonite was examined in batch experiments with and without citrate as ligand in the pH range pH 4-7.5. Without citrate, montmorillonite shows higher Ni sorption than goethite. Citrate strongly decreases Ni sorption to montmorillonite; in presence of 100 microM citrate goethite becomes a stronger Ni sorbent than montmorillonite. Ni and citrate sorption was modeled successfully using the diffuse double layer model with the following reactions: Goethite: 3 [triple bond]FeOH + Citrate(3-) + 3H+ <=> [triple bond] Fe3Citrate + 3H2O, [triple bond]FeOH + Ni2+ <=> [triple bond] FeONi + H+ and 2 [triple bond] FeOH + Citrate(3)- + Ni2+ <=> [triple bond] FeONiCitrate(2-) + H+. Montmorillonite: 2X- + Ni2+ <=> X2Ni and [triple bond] AIOH + Ni2+ <=> AIONi+ + H+. Sorption of Ni to a mixture of goethite and montmorillonite could be calculated by use of reactions and constants for the monomineral systems. Without citrate, the sorbed amount of Ni per mass unit in the mixture can be found as a simple average of sorption to the two single sorbents, while in presence of citrate Ni sorption to montmorillonite is strongly influenced by citrate sorption to goethite.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcussen et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: