This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Large language models (LLMs) show promise in biomedical research, but their effectiveness for genomic inquiry remains unclear. We developed GeneTuring, a benchmark consisting of 16 genomics tasks with 1,600 curated questions, and manually evaluated 48,000 answers from ten LLM configurations, including GPT-4o (via API, ChatGPT with web access, and a custom GPT setup), GPT-3.5, Claude 3.5, Gemini Advanced, GeneGPT (both slim and full), BioGPT, and BioMedLM. A custom GPT-4o configuration integrated with NCBI APIs, developed in this study as SeqSnap, achieved the best overall performance. GPT-4o with web access and GeneGPT demonstrated complementary strengths. Our findings highlight both the promise and current limitations of LLMs in genomics, and emphasize the value of combining LLMs with domain-specific tools for robust genomic intelligence. GeneTuring offers a key resource for benchmarking and improving LLMs in biomedical research. Biographical Note Dr. Wenpin Hou is an Assistant Professor (tenure-track) in the Department of Biostatistics at Columbia University and member of its Data Science Institute, developing AI and statistical methods for decoding gene regulatory programs from single-cell and spatial multiomics data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ji et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: