Why the study?
In preparation for launching a peer support program for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease, family doctors' attitudes, potential barriers, and facilitators were surveyed.
What are the attitudes of family doctors toward peer support programs for patients with type 2 diabetes and/or coronary artery disease?
What are the attitudes of family doctors toward peer support programs for patients with type 2 diabetes and/or coronary artery disease?
German family doctors view peer support programs as a valuable addition to care for patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease, though they do not expect it to reduce their workload.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Physicians' positive PSP attitudes support exploring integration for T2D/CAD care; cross-sectional data leaves open workload effects.
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are chronic illnesses where adherence to a healthy lifestyle is crucial. If organisational and cultural factors are well managed, Peer support programs (PSP) can improve self-management, quality of life, and health outcomes. In preparation for launching a PSP, we surveyed family doctors (FD) about their attitudes toward such a program and about potential barriers, and facilitators. METHODS: In March 2020 we surveyed 896 FDs from five university teaching practice networks in North-Rhine Westphalia, Germany, via an anonymous web-based survey. The questionnaire addressed details of PSPs, including suitable patients and FDs'role. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics; qualitative material underwent content analysis by two researchers. RESULTS: A total of 165 FDs responded (response rate: 18.4%), 97% were practice owners. Respondents viewed PSPs positively (T2D: 92.0%, CAD 89.9%), especially for patients with poor self-structuring (82.7%), low motivation (76.3%) and few social contacts (67.6%). On average, FDs were able to identify 4.0 ± 3.2 patients as potential group leaders. Major facilitators reported included motivation by peers (92.5%), exercise (79.1%), and social contacts (70.1%). Waning interest over time (73.1%) and poor motivation (70.9%) were considered barriers. The majority of FDs would recommend PSPs to their patients (89.5%). They considered such a program a valuable addition to current care (79.7%). The percentage of FDs' who expected long-term benefits for their workload was relatively low (37.6%). CONCLUSIONS: In an exploratory survey among German FDs on PSPs, respondents viewed PSPs as a valuable add-on for T2D and CAD patients, while not expecting a positive impact on their workload. Communication with FDs on PSPs may need to highlight anticipated implementation outcomes such as benefits of PSPs to the practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Majjouti et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: