Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two computational methods are common for simulating the evolution of three beams propagating in a birefringent medium and interacting through a second-order nonlinearity: the split-step method and solution of the coupled equations for the amplitudes of the spatial frequency components of the beams (Fourier-space method). I (i) compare the accuracy and computational cost of both methods, (ii) investigate the effect of using a first-order expansion for the refractive index as a function of propagation direction, and (iii) generalize both methods to handle arbitrary propagation directions in biaxial crystals. It turns out that the Fourier-space method with a Runge–Kutta solver gives best accuracy, but a symmetrized split-step method may be faster when low accuracy is sufficient. The first-order expansion for the refractive index gives a very small error for well-collimated beams, but the approximation is not important for computational efficiency. Modeling of parametric amplification outside the principal planes of a biaxial crystal is demonstrated, and to the author's knowledge this process has not been modeled in such detail before.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunnar Arisholm (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: