Effect of blood-flow restricted vs heavy-load resistance training on strength, power, and speed for healthy volunteers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

Background Low-load blood flow restriction (LL-BFR) training has been shown to enhance muscle strength, power, and speed, but its effectiveness compared to traditional high-load resistance (HLR) training remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of LL-BFR and HLR training on muscle strength, power, and speed. Methodology Studies were identified by searching the SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, PubMed, Web of Science, and CNKI databases up to May 13, 2024, using the following inclusion criteria: (a) healthy population; (b) comparison of LL-BFR vs HLR training; (c) pre- and post-training assessment of muscle strength (dynamic, isometric, and isokinetic), muscle power, jump, or speed performance; (d) PEDro scale score ≥4. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the PEDro tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, with meta-analyses conducted using the R program. Results A total of 41 studies, involving 853 subjects, were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the PEDro scores and GRADE assessment, the overall quality of the included studies was assessed as moderate. LL-BFR training showed a slightly smaller effect on maximal strength compared to HLR training (ES = −0.19, 95% CI [−0.31 to −0.06], p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between LL-BFR and HLR training for muscle power (ES = −0.04, 95% CI [−0.33 to 0.24], p > 0.05), jump performance (ES = −0.08, 95% CI [−0.30 to 0.15], p > 0.05), and speed (ES = −0.28, 95% CI [−0.71 to 0.15], p > 0.05). Additionally, individual characteristics ( i.e ., age, gender, and training status) and training parameters ( i.e ., training duration, frequency, cuff pressure, and cuff width) did not significantly moderate the training effect. Conclusions LL-BFR training showed slightly less improvement in maximal strength compared to HLR training but demonstrated comparable effects on muscle power, jump performance, and speed in healthy individuals in healthy individuals. These findings suggest that LL-BFR may be a practical and effective alternative for individuals seeking performance improvements with lower training loads.

LL-BFR offers comparable power/speed gains to HLR despite modestly lower strength effects; extends meta-analytic support for its use in healthy adults.