Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Barthes' rhetoric of sexuality transcribes the text as a body imbued with libidinal energy and capable of generating fantasies through a figurative language that articulates theoretical fictions. In the process of delineating these critical texts, writing aspires to the status of matter. What Barthes terms the grain of the voice-la materialite du corps parlant sa langue maternelle (00, 238)-comes to signify how the body speaks in writing through verbal choreographics which involve positions of passion, its drives, controls and
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawrence D. Kritzman (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: