Root NO 3 − and NH 4 + influx systems of two early‐successional species of temperate (trembling aspen: Populus tremuloides Michx.) and boreal (lodgepole pine: Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) forest ecosystems were characterized. NO 3 − and NH 4 + influxes were biphasic, consisting of saturable high‐affinity (HATS) and constitutive non‐saturable low‐affinity transport systems (LATS) that were evident at low and relatively high N concentrations, respectively. NO 3 − influx via HATS was inducible (IHATS); nitrate pre‐treatment resulted in 8–10‐fold increases in the V max for influx in both species. By contrast, HATS for NH 4 + were entirely constitutive. In both species, V max values for NH 4 + influx were higher than those for NO 3 − uptake; the differences were larger in pine (6‐fold) than aspen (1·8‐fold). In aspen, the K m for NH 4 + influx by HATS was approximately 3‐fold higher than for IHATS NO 3 − influx, while in pine the K m for IHATS NO 3 − influx was approximately 3‐fold higher than for NH 4 + influx. The aspen IHATS for NO 3 − influx appeared to be more efficient than that of pine ( V max values for aspen being approximately 10‐fold higher and K m values being approximately 13‐fold lower than for pine). By contrast, only small differences in values for the NH 4 + HATS were evident between the two species. The kinetic parameters observed here probably result from adaptations to the N availabilities in their respective natural habitats; these may contribute to the distribution and niche separation of these species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Min et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: