Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Highlights the complex relationship between single genetic mutations in cardiac ion channels (like SCN5A) and the manifestation of multiple, sometimes phenotypically opposite, arrhythmogenic syndromes.
Normal cardiac excitation and relaxation involves a delicate balance of complex dynamic interactions between ionic currents passing through a variety of membrane channels and the cellular environment. Genetic defects, polymorphisms, therapeutic intervention or structural abnormalities can disrupt this balance and underlie severe arrhythmogenic phenotypes that lead to sudden cardiac death. Inheritable gene defects give rise to phenotypic variation and an unpredictable manifestation of syndromes, ranging from silent gene carriers to profoundly symptomatic individuals, even within single families (1–7). As such, realizing the relationship between genetic mutations and clinical syndromes is becoming increasingly complex. In this issue of the JCI, Grant and colleagues (3) investigate the manifestations of phenotypically opposite and overlapping cardiac arrhythmogenic syndromes that surprisingly stem from the same mutation (1–4). Cardiac excitation reflects membrane depolarization of cardiac myocytes, primarily due to the activation of fast voltage-dependent Na+ channels that underlie the action potential upstroke. Activation is followed by a long depolarized plateau phase that permits Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, binding of Ca2+ to contractile proteins on the sarcomeres, and coordinated contraction. Repolarization follows due to the time- and voltage-dependent activation of repolarizing potassium currents. Relaxation of contraction is coupled to the electrical repolarization phase, which allows filling of the ventricles prior to the next excitation. Each of these electrical processes can be detected on the body surface electrocardiogram (ECG) as a signal average of the temporal and spatial gradients generated during each phase (8–11) (Figure (Figure1a).1a). Electrical excitation gradients in the atria (atrial depolarization) manifest on the ECG as P waves, while gradients of ventricular depolarization are seen as the QRS complex. Gradients in ventricular repolarization are reflected in the T wave (Figure (Figure11). Figure 1 Electrical gradients in the myocardium can be detected on the body surface ECG. (a) An illustrative example of a single cardiac cycle detected as spatial and temporal electrical gradients on the ECG. The P wave is generated by the spread of excitation ... A recently described example of a multi-syndrome genetic defect in the SCN5A gene, encoding the cardiac Na+ channel (Figure (Figure2),2), is the insertion of an aspartic acid, 1795insD, in the C-terminus of the cardiac Na+ channel that underlies both Brugada (BrS) and Long-QT (LQTs) cardiac arrhythmic syndromes (1, 2). Figure 2 The predicted transmembrane topology of domains I–IV of the cardiac Na+ channel α subunit encoded by SCN5A showing the location and nature of the mutations inducing LQTs, BrS, and isolated cardiac conduction disease. Grant and colleagues investigate an even more complex mutation (3). The deletion of lysine, ΔK1500, in the III–IV linker of SCN5A (Figure (Figure2)2) is associated with BrS, LQTs, and isolated cardiac conduction disease (ICCD). LQTs is typically associated with a gain of Na+ channel function that stems from mutation induced destabilization of channel inactivation, leading to a persistent inward Na+ current (INa) during the action potential (AP) plateau and prolonged repolarization (12, 13). Paradoxically, BrS and ICCD are linked to a loss of Na+ channel function and a resulting reduction in macroscopic current (3, 6, 7, 14, 15). How can multiple and seemingly contradictory arrhythmic syndromes arise from a mutation at a single locus?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clancy et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: