Why the study?
Do patients with acute 'mild' myocardial infarction have a different prognosis compared to those with transmural myocardial infarction?
Do patients with acute 'mild' myocardial infarction have a different prognosis compared to those with transmural myocardial infarction?
Patients with acute 'mild' or nontransmural myocardial infarction have a similar prognosis to those with transmural infarction and require identical management.
Patients with acute myocardial infarction and an uncomplicated early clinical course are often thought to have suffered a mild myocardial infarction. There is also a tendency to link ECG changes suggestive of nontransmural necrosis with such a benign clinical course. Recent work proves that such patients have the same short- and long-term prognosis, similar angiographic and hemodynamic patterns, and deserve management identical to that for patients with transmural myocardial infarction. It is hoped that by combining the older modalities with new diagnostic methods it will be possible to quantitate the magnitude of old and new myocardial ischemic necrosis on which prognosis to a great extent is based.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John E. Madias (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: