Context: Cleft lip and palate (CLP) is a craniofacial anomaly that may interfere with the growth and development of adjacent structures, including the paranasal sinuses. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the volumes of the maxillary, frontal, ethmoidal, and sphenoidal sinuses in individuals with unilateral CLP, bilateral CLP, and non-cleft controls using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Settings and Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Subjects and Methods: CBCT scans of 300 individuals (mean age: 23.8 ± 4.6 years) were analyzed and divided into three groups: unilateral CLP ( n = 100), bilateral CLP ( n = 100), and noncleft controls ( n = 100). All scans presented an adequate field of view for paranasal sinus evaluation. Volumetric measurements were obtained through semiautomatic segmentation using ITK-SNAP software with multiplanar assessment. Statistical Analysis Used: Data normality was assessed, and parametric or nonparametric statistical tests were applied as appropriate. Statistical significance was established at P < 0.05. Results: Individuals with CLP presented significantly larger frontal sinus volumes compared to controls ( P < 0.001). In unilateral CLP cases, a tendency toward reduced maxillary sinus volume on the cleft side was observed, although without statistical significance ( P = 0.052). No significant differences were found in ethmoidal ( P = 0.472) or sphenoidal sinus volumes ( P = 0.595). Volumetric differences mainly affected the anterior paranasal sinuses. Conclusions: CLP is associated with selective volumetric changes in the paranasal sinuses, characterized by reduced maxillary sinus volume and increased frontal sinus volume. CBCT-based volumetric analysis is a reliable method for detecting craniofacial adaptations and may contribute to surgical planning and individualized rehabilitation in patients with CLP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gringo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: