Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We assessed the effect of amblyopic suppression on the pattern visual evoked potential (P-VEP). Since anisometropic amblyopia is associated with the monofixation syndrome and a central suppression scotoma in the amblyopic eye, patients with this functional defect were used for the study. Five anisometropic amblyopes and four normal subjects were studied using the P-VEP test. A modified haploscope was used to present a pattern stimulus to the area of suppression. By comparing responses generated under monocular conditions (non-suppression) with monocular responses under binocular viewing conditions (suppression), we measured the effect of suppression on the P-VEP. Our results show that amblyopic suppression completely abolishes P-1 amplitudes in patients with large suppression scotomas; in patients with small suppression scotomas the P-1 amplitudes were greatly reduced. Rivalry in normals also caused a reduction in P-1 amplitudes, but to a much lesser degree than that associated with anisometropic suppression. Patients with significant amblyopia did not show a rivalry effect on the P-VEP. Because the P-1 wave of the transient P-VEP is thought to represent activity at the level of the striate cortex, our results indicate that suppression probably occurs at the striate cortex or lateral geniculate nucleus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wright et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: