This paper is about the analysis and interpretation of micromammal samples from archaeological sites while reporting on a black rat assemblage from XIII th century Muslim levels in the city of Mertola. Questions concerning skeletal representation, size plus age estimations and bone fragmentation are discussed from a taphonomic standpoint. It is concluded that the tendency to interpret rodent accumulations in anthropic sites as evidence of preybird activities might be an oversimplification in need of substantial revision.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muñiz et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: