Why the study?
Do CYP2C9*2/*3, VKORC1(1173), and CYP4F2*3 genetic variants affect the risk of major bleeding in patients treated with warfarin?
Do CYP2C9*2/*3, VKORC1(1173), and CYP4F2*3 genetic variants affect the risk of major bleeding in patients treated with warfarin?
The CYP4F2*3 variant is associated with a 38% lower risk of major bleeding in long-term warfarin users in a community setting.
CYP4F2*3 may lower major bleeding risk on warfarin; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
The influence of warfarin pharmacogenomics on major bleeding risk has been little studied in long-term users and non-specialist care settings. We conducted a case-control study to evaluate associations between CYP2C9*2/*3, VKORC1(1173), and CYP4F2*3 variants and major bleeding among patients treated with warfarin in a community setting. We calculated major bleeding odds ratios, adjusting for race, duration of warfarin use, age, gender, and body mass index. In 265 cases and 305 controls with 3.4 and 3.7 mean years of warfarin use, respectively, CYP4F2*3 was associated with decreased major bleeding risk (odds ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.91). CYP2C9*2/*3 and VKORC1(1173) had null associations overall, but there was a nonsignificant increase in major bleeding risk in patients with duration <6 months (odds ratio: 1.30; 95% confidence interval: 0.60-2.83; odds ratio: 1.23; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-2.64, respectively). In summary, in the largest study of warfarin pharmacogenomics and major bleeding to date, we found a 38% lower risk in patients with CYP4F2*3, potentially reflecting interaction with warfarin and dietary vitamin K intake and warranting additional evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boudreau et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: