Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TiO 2 (Anatase) surface has been modified with p ‐substituted benzaldehydes ( p = OCH 3 , CH 3 , H, CN, and NO 2 ) and 4‐stilbene carboxaldehyde. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy, UV–Vis reflectance spectra, and theoretical calculations indicate that the TiO 2 surface has been chemically modified and supported acetal formation by means of TiO 2 –OH reaction with the aldehyde. A steady state photocurrent was obtained during simulated UV light irradiation of the acetal‐TiO 2 in aqueous solution. Once the light irradiation is turned off, open‐circuit potential decay measurements were used in order to determine the electron life‐time ( t n ). Excited electron decay is inhibited down to 1 s when the electron withdrawing delocalization capacity of the modified TiO 2 increases. Electron life‐time also depends on the solution reduction capacity. However, the unmodified TiO 2 life‐time does not. The TiO 2 modification results in a new series of photocatalysts that improve the organic contaminants degradation in solution because slow electron decay also induces retardation of the electron‐hole recombination. Therefore, there is a linear relationship between the electron decay life‐time and degradation rate constant. However, when electron delocalization is further increased in a way that the electron life‐time becomes ca. 7 s, degradation rate is kept constant. Therefore, the extra electron stability compromise degradation in such a way that the modified nanoparticle switches from a useful oxidant agent to a material that favors the charge carriers separation through a stable radical anion formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Núñez et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: