Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims: To determine the number of omitted medication doses for hospital inpatients, identify the reasons and assess their severity. Method: The study involved intensive drug chart surveillance over a period of 5 days in two wards that included a wide range of medical and surgical specialties of a metropolitan teaching hospital. Inpatients receiving regular or once‐only medication for at least 5 days were monitored. A multidisciplinary committee assessed the severity of the omitted doses on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is no potential harm to the patient and 10 is the potential for death. Results: Drug charts for 67 inpatients were audited. A total of 4887 doses were prescribed of which 369 (7 .6%) were recorded as dose omissions. In 273 of the 369 (74%) omitted doses, there were documented reasons for omission. 120 of the 369 doses omitted were scored for severity, with 86% (103/120) of these considered to have placed the patients at some risk of harm. No omitted doses were rated above 7 in severity. Conclusion: This study identified a substantial number of doses omitted, and a significant proportion of these were for no clear reason. The majority of the omitted doses were considered to have a potentially negative effect on the patient. Greater awareness of the extent of this problem has facilitated a collaborative effort, led by pharmacists, to improve the medication administration system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawler et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: