Why the study?
Does CineMPRAGE reconstruction improve the differentiation of blood flow artifacts from true intraplaque hemorrhage in patients undergoing carotid imaging?
Does CineMPRAGE reconstruction improve the differentiation of blood flow artifacts from true intraplaque hemorrhage in patients undergoing carotid imaging?
CineMPRAGE reconstruction of standard MPRAGE data allows for better differentiation of true carotid intraplaque hemorrhage from blood flow artifacts by observing signal constancy over the cardiac cycle.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CineMPRAGE may aid differentiation of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage from flow artifacts; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (3D MPRAGE) has been shown to be a sensitive method to image carotid intraplaque hemorrhage. As the MPRAGE sequence used to identify potential intraplaque hemorrhage does not utilize cardiac gating, it is difficult to optimize the inversion times due to the dynamic nature of flowing blood. As a result, a best fit inversion time is often determined experimentally and then used for in vivo clinical examination. This results in compromised blood suppression and occasional hemorrhage mimicking flow artifacts. We demonstrate that a retrospective cardiac correlated reconstruction can be applied to the conventional MPRAGE sequence (CineMPRAGE) to more accurately identify blood signal. This CineMPRAGE reconstruction uses the data from a standard nongated MPRAGE sequence to generate a full sequence of cardiac correlated images throughout the cardiac cycle and, therefore, provides a dynamic view of the carotid artery and a better ability to discern blood signal from potential intraplaque hemorrhage. In our preliminary study of 35 patients, signal from potential hemorrhage was constant over the cardiac cycle, whereas any signal from blood flow artifact was observed as an oscillating signal over the cardiac cycle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendes et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: