Why the study?
Cardiovascular risk scores have limitations in calibration, discrimination, and sensitivity, prompting evaluation of risk modulators to improve risk stratification.
Does screening for risk modulators (CAP, CAC score, Lp(a)) alter risk stratification and statin indications in primary prevention patients?
Does screening for risk modulators (CAP, CAC score, Lp(a)) alter risk stratification and statin indications in primary prevention patients?
Screening for risk modulators like CAP, CAC, and Lp(a) in primary prevention patients frequently identifies subclinical disease even in low-risk individuals, significantly increasing the indication for statin therapy.
Screening for risk modulators may increase statin eligibility in primary prevention; leaves open whether this improves outcomes.
Background: Cardiovascular risk scores have limitations related to calibration, discrimination, and low sensitivity. Different "risk modulators" have been identified to improve cardiovascular risk stratification: carotid atherosclerotic plaque (CAP), coronary artery calcium (CAC) score and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. Objectives: The aims of this study were: 1) to determine the prevalence of risk modulators mentioned in a primary prevention population; 2) determine the concordance between the 2 methods of detecting subclinical atherosclerosis; and 3) establish which proportion of patients should receive statins according to the initial risk stratification and after being recategorized by screening for risk modulators. Methods: Individuals aged 18 to 79 years who consulted for cardiovascular risk assessment and who were not receiving lipid-lowering treatment were included. The risk score was calculated in each patient using ASCVD Risk Estimator. The presence of CAP, CAC score and Lp(a) level were evaluated. Results: The cohort was made up of 348 patients; mean age was 55.6 ± 12.2 years and 45.4% were men. In the total population, 29.8%, 36.8%, and 53.2% of patients showed Lp(a) value ≥ 50 mg/dL, CAP, or a CAC score > 0, respectively. The prevalence of CAP and CAC score was progressively higher according to the cardiovascular risk category; however, the proportion of low-risk subjects who had risk modulators was considerable (Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dl: 25.7%; CAP: 22%; CAC score > 0: 33%). In the 60 subjects <45 years , the prevalence of CAC score > 0 and CAP was 18.3% and 10%, respectively. The agreement between the two methods for quantifying subclinical atheromatosis was fair (kappa= 0.33). The indication for statin treatment increased by 31.6% after evaluating the presence of modulators. Conclusion: The presence of risk modulators was common in this population in primary prevention, even in low-risk subjects or <45 years. Detection of risk modulators could improve initial stratification and lead to reconsideration of statin treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siniawski et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: