Why the study?
Essential hypertension is a threat to the older population, but real-world studies assessing olmesartan medoxomil-amlodipine besylate tablets in older Chinese patients were lacking.
Does olmesartan medoxomil-amlodipine besylate reduce blood pressure in older Chinese patients with essential hypertension?
Does olmesartan medoxomil-amlodipine besylate reduce blood pressure in older Chinese patients with essential hypertension?
Olmesartan medoxomil-amlodipine besylate 20/5 mg effectively and safely lowers blood pressure in older Chinese patients with essential hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports BP reduction with this combination in older Chinese patients; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Essential hypertension is a notable threat for the older (age, ≥65 years) population. However, to the best of our knowledge, a real‑world study assessing olmesartan medoxomil‑amlodipine besylate (OM‑AML) tablets in older Chinese patients with essential hypertension has not been performed. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OM‑AML tablets in these patients. A total of 463 older Chinese patients with essential hypertension treated with OM‑AML (20/5 mg) tablets (Sevikar®) were analyzed in a prospective, single‑arm, multi‑center, real‑world study. Seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) and seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) at baseline, and at week (W)4 and W8 after OM‑AML tablet administration were measured. The mean ± standard error change of SeSBP/SeDBP was ‑10.3±0.8/‑4.6±0.5 and ‑12.5±0.8/‑5.6±0.5 mmHg at W4 and W8, respectively. At W4, 74.1 and 26.8% of patients achieved BP target according to the China and American Heart Association (AHA) criteria, while at W8, 78.0 and 38.7% of patients reached these BP targets accordingly. Finally, 76.5 and 80.5% of patients achieved BP response at W4 and W8, respectively. Furthermore, home‑measured SeSBP and SeDBP were significantly decreased from W1 to W8 (both P<0.001). Additionally, the satisfaction of both patients and physicians was elevated at W8 compared with at W0 (both P<0.001). The medication possession rate from baseline to W4 and W8 was 95.5 and 92.5%. The most common drug‑associated adverse events by system organ classes were nervous system disorder (4.5%), vascular disorder (2.8%), and general disorder and administration site conditions (2.6%), which were generally mild. In conclusion, OM‑AML tablets may be considered effective and safe in lowering BP, enabling the achievement of guideline‑recommended BP targets in older Chinese patients with essential hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: