A novel class of light harvesting conjugated block copolymers, with electron-donating conjugated blocks ( D ) connected to electron-accepting conjugated blocks ( A ) via non conjugated and flexible bridge chains (B), has been designed, synthesized, and characterized. Specifically, D is a decyloxy-substituted polyphenylenevinylene (C 10 −PPV). A 1 and A 2 are PPVs with sulfone (SO 2 ) acceptor moieties substituted on every other phenylene unit. A 1 carries two decyloxy groups on every phenylene unit, while in A 2, half of the phenylene units are unsubstituted. The optical energy gaps are 2.24 eV for the donor block ( D ), 2.33 and 2.45 eV for A 1 and A 2 acceptor blocks. LUMO level offsets are 0.24 and 0.16 eV for D / A 1 and D / A 2 pairs, respectively. Comparing the photoluminescence from both films and solutions, very large red shifts (71 and 74 nm for A 1 and A 2 respectively) were observed in the two acceptor polymers. These red shifts in the emission spectra were more than twice as much as that observed for D (31 nm). The ( DBA 1 B ) n and ( DBA 2 B ) n block copolymer films exhibited improved processability and optoelectronic properties when compared with the corresponding films composed of donor/acceptor blends. Atomic force microscopic (AFM) studies of D, A 1, and A 2 films were also undertaken to observe the degree of aggregation in the films. The results indicate the tendency of intermolecular aggregation increases as A 2 > D > A 1 . AFM topological images revealed that large aggregates of several hundreds of nanometers formed in donor/acceptor blend films, while in block copolymer films, domain sizes were similar to individual block sizes which are 1 order of magnitude smaller than in the blend.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: