Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The crown thioether silver(I) complexes {[Ag{(OH)2[16]aneS4}]NO3}∞1 and {[Ag{(OH)2[16]aneS4}][O2CMe]}∞2 and the copper(II) complex [Cu{(OH)2[16]aneS4}][ClO4]23, where (OH)2[16]aneS4= 1,5,9,13-tetrathiacyclohexadecane-3,11-diol, have been prepared by reaction of (OH)2[16]aneS4 with the appropriate metal salt. The two silver structures are not isomorphous. Complex 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2 with a= 13.500(4), b= 9.178(2), c= 8.695(4)Å, β= 121.99(2)° and Z= 2. Silver(I) is tetrahedrally bound with four thioether group from four symmetry-related macrocycles and each ligand molecule in turn co-ordinates to four separate silver(I) ions in an exodentate fashion to yield a three-dimensional tetrahedral polymeric network. Complex 2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pccn with a= 14.121(9), b= 17.203(8), c= 15.940(3)Å and Z= 8. It contains two types of crystallographically different silver(I) ions, both of which are co-ordinated by four sulfur atoms from four symmetry-related macrocycles in a rather distorted-tetrahedral fashion. The silver atoms are in a two-dimensional sheet arrangement interconnected by the macrocycle. Complex 3 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c with a= 7.820(2), b= 13.853(2), c= 9.627(2)Å, β= 90.85(2)° and Z= 2. The molecule is a discrete monomer in which the tetradentate macrocycle is in the endodentate conformation with four thioether donors in a precisely square-planar arrangement around the copper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munakata et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: