Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Lung ultrasound (LUS) imaging is a quick, non-invasive, accurate and quantitative method. Its prognostic value in those with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still unknown. Aim: To know if poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients could be predicted on the basis of LUS score at admission. Patients and methods: A prospective cohort study involved 40 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 according to Egyptian protocol for management of COVID-19 patients. All patients subjected to full history taking, clinical assessment, laboratory investigation (routine labs, serum ferritin, C-reactive protein, LDH and D-dimer) and imaging (chest X-ray, ultrasound and CT without contrast). Results: The baseline LUS score of patients was significantly higher among patients who needed mechanical ventilation and patients who died at admission (p=0.012 and 0.015 at admission, respectively) and at 4th day (0.026 and 0.024 at 4th day, respectively). Baseline LUS score could predict the need of MV at cutoff value >17 with sensitivity 73.68%, specificity 66.67%, PPV 66.7% and NPV 73.7% and could predict the mortality at cut off value 17 with sensitivity 70%, specificity 65%, PPV 66.7%, NPV 68.4%. Conclusion: Lung ultrasound score was a strong predictor of mortality, ICU admission, and the need for mechanical ventilation in patients with critical condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kholy et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: