Key result
Regional and national cohorts of African American Medicare beneficiaries had higher mortality compared to Jackson Heart Study participants (adjusted HRs 1.52 and 1.49, respectively).
Why the study?
Do characteristics and outcomes of African American Medicare beneficiaries in the Jackson Heart Study differ from regional and national cohorts?
Observational (n=154,088)
Yes
Do characteristics and outcomes of African American Medicare beneficiaries in the Jackson Heart Study differ from regional and national cohorts?
Hazard Ratio: 1.52 (95% CI 1.31–1.76)
JHS-Medicare participants had fewer comorbid conditions, better survival, and lower Medicare costs compared with regional and national cohorts, suggesting healthy volunteer bias and higher socioeconomic status.
BACKGROUND: The Jackson Heart Study (JHS) assesses cardiovascular disease risk factors among African Americans in Jackson, Mississippi. Whether characteristics of JHS participants differ from those of a broader African American population are unknown. METHODS: In a retrospective observational analysis, we compared characteristics and outcomes of JHS participants 65 years old and older and enrolled in Medicare (n = 1,105) to regional (n = 57,489) and national (n = 95,494) cohorts of African American Medicare beneficiaries. We weighted the regional and national cohorts to match the age and sex distributions of the JHS-Medicare cohort for pairwise baseline comparisons. Outcomes of interest included mortality and Medicare costs. We used Cox proportional hazards models to test associations between cohorts and outcomes. RESULTS: The JHS-Medicare cohort was younger, included more women, and had fewer beneficiaries with dual Medicare-Medicaid eligibility, compared with regional and national Medicare cohorts. The cohort also had lower risks of stroke, lung disease, heart failure, diabetes, and renal disease. Mean Medicare costs were lower ($5,066 [SD = $11,932]) than in the regional ($7,419 [SD = $17,574]) and national ($8,013 [SD = $19,378]) cohorts. The regional and national cohorts had higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratios = 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31, 1.76; and 1.49; 95% CI = 1.29, 1.73, respectively). Subgroup analysis for dual Medicare-Medicaid eligibility attenuated mortality differences. CONCLUSION: JHS-Medicare participants had fewer comorbid conditions, better survival, and lower Medicare costs compared with regional and national cohorts. Observed differences may reflect healthy volunteer bias and higher socioeconomic status.See video abstract at, http://links.lww.com/EDE/B235.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parikh et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease risk factors (n=154,088). Regional and national cohorts vs. Jackson Heart Study (JHS) cohort was evaluated on Mortality (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.31-1.76). Regional and national cohorts of African American Medicare beneficiaries had higher mortality compared to Jackson Heart Study participants (adjusted HRs 1.52 and 1.49, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: