Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We describe a familial paracentric inversion (X)(q21.2 q24) in a family with 2 male and 2 female carriers. The males were mentally retarded and the females were normal with normal ovarian function. It is suggested that a recessive mental retardation (MR) gene was disrupted by one of the inversion breakpoints, although an X-linked MR gene which by chance is linked to the inv(X) could not be ruled out. In the female carriers of the paracentric inversion a random X-inactivation was demonstrated. The normal ovarian function is an exception to the concept of "critical region" at Xq13-q26.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abeliovich et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: