This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the properties and feasibility of the glucose analog, 2-(18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG), three short (18)F-labeled carboxylic acids, (18)F-fluoroacetate ((18)F-FAC), 2-(18)F-fluoropropionic acid ((18)F-FPA) and 4-((18)F)fluorobenzoic acid ((18)F-FBA), for differentiating tumors from inflammation. METHODS: Biodistributions of (18)F-FAC, (18)F-FPA and (18)F-FBA were determined on normal Kunming mice, and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with these tracers were performed on the separate tumor-bearing mice model and inflammation mice model in comparison with (18)F-FDG. RESULTS: Biodistribution results showed that (18)F-FAC and (18)F-FPA had similar biodistribution profiles and the slow radioactivity clearance from most tissues excluding the in vivo defluorination of (18)F-FAC, and (18)F-FBA demonstrated a lower uptake and fast clearance in most tissues. PET imaging with (18)F-FDG, (18)F-FAC and (18)F-FPA revealed the high uptake in both tumor and inflammatory lesions. The ratios of tumor-to-inflammation were 1.63 ± 0.28 for (18)F-FDG, 1.20 ± 0.38 for (18)F-FAC, and 1.41 ± 0.33 for (18)F-FPA at 60 min postinjection, respectively. While clear tumor images with high contrast between tumor and inflammation lesion were observed in (18)F-FBA/PET with the highest ratio of tumor-to-inflammation (1.98 ± 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated (18)F-FBA is a promising PET probe to distinguish tumor from inflammation. But the further modification of (18)F-FBA structure is required to improve its pharmacokinetics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: